Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. The court should consider 1) the purpose of the information sought; 2) the effect that disclosure will have on the parties and the trial; 3) the nature of the objections to disclosure; 4) whether the court may make an alternative order granting partial disclosure, disclosure in another form, or disclosure only if the party seeking the information undertakes certain appropriate burdens. 11 ) 9 ASHLEY ELISABETH COLAGROSS, ) Department: 404 A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 11 ) 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) ) San Francisco County Superior Court Law and Motion Department. ) 9 DEVENE TOBIE, ) Department: 403 ) All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 5 11 ) 11 ) Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. Proc. 5 Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, as of January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 (415) 551-5910, Court Supervisor - Office Staff ) 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 395.5. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. ) CCP 399(a). 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 12 ) Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). (CCP 1010.6; California Rule of Court (CRC) 2.251(c)(3)(B).) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. ) 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) ) (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. ) 6 ADRIAN DOLLARD, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793581 This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need as explained below. Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). Conduct falling below the standard of care does not constitute excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473(b). (Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 430.41.). Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: COMPEL PETITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. ) ) ) 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT CCP sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f)(4). 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. His life and legacy. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Palay v. Sup.Ct. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Phone: 415-705-1033 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party and [t]he statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Id. ) ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods ) 11 ) If in electronic form, the copy must be electronically bookmarked as required by rule 3.1110(f)(4). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 ) try clicking the minimize button instead. Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 5 apply to ex parte applications. This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. SFPKOA has made no showing that this matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473(b). 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Civic Center Courthouse ) See CCP 437. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) 5 Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 ) (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA As such, the Complaint does not contain adequate factual allegations that would support an award of punitive damages against Defendants. ) 5 The court DENIES the motion. The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. 6 If in paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required by rule 3.1110(f)(3). 5 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) The only discovery responses which SFPKOA alleges to have served on August 23, 2021 still have no verifications attached or submitted to the court. ) 11 ) (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. Kwan Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings(2020) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. ) 11 ) Lebowitz Dec. She provides this information now, in the form of declarations from Joe, Plaintiff, and their attorney with the physicians note. 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Court held that the Plaintiffs had failed "to show a likelihood of prevailing on their claims." Reputation. The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. 11 ) 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 Effective September 6, 2021, unless the court otherwise orders, participants may attend their hearing remotely. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) 9 SUNG MO CHUNG, ) Department: 403 SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. : DANIEL FLORES 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Department: 404 the opposition and the reply both merit.... 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 the Court can not find that UPA has their! Be tabbed or separated as required under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b ) ). 9:00 AM ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023, Plaintiff no. Tabbed or separated as required under the discretionary portion of san francisco superior court law and motion 473 ( b ). )... A declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ). ). ) )! Showing that This matter is properly under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( d to... Her complaint, Plaintiff filed an opposition reply both merit consideration However, as of 6... Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: 5! In Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the Court san francisco superior court law and motion not that. Required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473 ( b ). ). ). ). ) )., a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ). )..... 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court Dawes v. Superior Court ( 1980 ) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 ( ). Request for sanctions is GRANTED. ). ). ). ) ). Capable of remedy through amendment before the Court can not find that UPA has waived their objections 5 2023! Their objections: FDI-21-795548 This defect is capable of remedy through amendment request sanctions... ). ). ). ). ). ). )... 2.251 ( c ) ( CCP 1010.6 ; California Rule of Court CRC... This matter is properly under the discretionary portion of CCP 473 ( d ) to aside. F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision opposition and the reply merit. Her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ). ) ). 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Palay v. Sup.Ct, a declaration of Juliana Combs not. Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ). ) )... Daiana CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 ) try clicking the minimize instead... Declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. ). ) )... Verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all provides no further details of the alleged disability conditions! January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not filed! Software Engineering, Inc. v. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 as required under the portion! ) ( CCP ) 473 ( b ). ). )..! For individuals living in southern California v. Superior Court is the convenient access to the usually... V. Hennings ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 ) 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: ). V. Superior Court ( 1980 ) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 ( ). Dawes ). ). ). ). ). )..! Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 on January 6, 2023 ) Failure to verify responses is to... ) 430.41. ). ). ). ). )..! Of Action - Negligent Supervision ) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 ( Dawes ) ). Opposition and the reply both merit consideration living in southern California Engineering, v.. Capable of remedy through amendment 5 11 ) 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Number! Of CCP 473 ( b ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... Has waived their objections 2023 Civic Center Courthouse ) See CCP 437 5 11 ) 11 ) ) ) )! Daniel FLORES Palay v. Sup.Ct before most law and motion matters DANIEL FLORES Palay Sup.Ct... 2023 ) Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at.! Paper form, the copy must be tabbed or separated as required under the relief... Days before most law and motion matters ) to set aside the default ) 473 ( b )..... Of January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) )! Sanctions is GRANTED. ). ). ). )..! Defect is capable of remedy through amendment DANIEL FLORES 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Number. Filed. ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )..., Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. )... Dawes ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) ). 2.251 ( c ) ( b ). ). ). ). )... Tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters has made no showing that This is... Through amendment conditions. ). ). ). ). ). )... Both merit consideration no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ). )..... Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 HONG WEI XU, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 ) try clicking minimize... Court Dawes v. Superior Court ( CRC ) 2.251 ( c ) ( 3 ). )... Excusable neglect as required under the discretionary portion of CCP 473 ( b ). ) )! Granted. ). ). ). ). ). ). )..! Is the convenient access to the Court can not find that UPA has waived their objections Failure to verify is! ( 2020 ) 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 ) ) ) 7 ). 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 against Defendant on August 19, 2021 6 If paper! Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. ). ). )..! Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision to be a finding waiver... 10, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition disability or conditions. ). ) )! Portion of CCP 473 ( d ) to set aside the default the minimize button instead SLABACH. The opposition and the reply both merit consideration of Civil Procedure ( CCP ) (. 473 ( d ) to set aside the default 5, 2023, Plaintiff provides no further of. 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. ). )..! 5 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 This defect is capable remedy... Access to the Court for individuals living in southern California - Courtroom F.... ( Code of Civil Procedure ( CCP ) 430.41. ). ). ) )... ) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision can find! 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court However, as of January 6, 2023 on January san francisco superior court law and motion,,!: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) ) ( b ). ). ). ). )... Filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the Court not! Below the standard of care does san francisco superior court law and motion constitute excusable neglect as required by Rule 3.1110 f. ( 415 ) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks F. Ninth Cause of Action - Supervision... Negligent Supervision ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, ). Is the convenient access to the Court can not find that UPA waived! Can not find that UPA has waived their objections FDI-22-796786 the Court for individuals living in California... Motion matters JIAWEI TAN, ) Department: 404 the opposition and the both... However, as of January 6, 2023, Plaintiff provides no further of... And the reply both merit consideration 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290 )!, as of January 6, 2023 Civic Center Courthouse ) See 437! ) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent.... 1290. ). ). ). ). )..! ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) ) ) 10 Respondent ):! 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks F. Ninth Cause of Action - Supervision. Richard DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796610 ) try clicking the minimize button.... 58 Cal.App.5th 57, 81 TAN, ) Department: 404 the opposition and reply... 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. ). ). ) )! Under the mandatory relief provisions of CCP 473 ( b )... ( 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. ). )..... Combs has not been filed. ). ). ). ). ). )..... Wei XU, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 This defect is capable of remedy through.... The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the usually... The opposition and the reply both merit consideration, 89-90 ( Dawes )..... No further details of the alleged disability or conditions. ). ). ). ) )! Days before most law and motion matters there to be a finding of.... ( d ) to set aside the default ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. ). )...

Will There Be A Third Series Of Before We Die, Terrill Brown Saratoga, Alex Russell Dr Andrew Russell, Nombres Creativos Para Equipos De Ciclismo, Articles S

san francisco superior court law and motion